![]() Spreading Infectious Diseases: The Cough/Sneeze! Courtesy of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
|
Clinically proven, Vira Block has 15 times more germ-killing effectiveness that typical sanitizer gels. *(2002)
Recent laboratory studies have found alcohol-based hand rinses (liquids) reduce bacterial counts on the hands of volunteers to a greater degree than hand gels. (2,3)
In vivo efficacy data has shown our formula to be effective against a wide range of pathogens, bactericidal (ecoli, strep, stapha, MRSA, VRE). Bacterial testing description, EU 1500, FDA tentative final monogram #333470,1994
Additional international efficacy data further confirms product spectrum of effectiveness against pathogens including hepatitis A-C, HIV, influenza B (Avian), rotavirus, and adenovirus.
In general many alcohol-based hand rubs are likely to be effective against enveloped viruses such as herpes simplex, human immunodeficiency, hepatitis B, and respiratory syncytial virus (1,5).
Non-enveloped viruses such as rhinovirses, adenovirus and rotavirus tend to be somewhat more resistant to alcohols. However, alcohols have been shown in in-vivo studies to significantly reduce the titer of such viruses recovered from artificially contaminated fingers (6,7). Additionally other non-enveloped viruses including Hepatitis A virus and enteroviruses are the most resistant to disinfectants and antiseptic agents. Alcohol-based preparations with high alcohol content EG 75-95% ethanol are more likely to be effective against hepatitis A virus and enteroviruses (1,8,9).
Vira Block Antiseptic Hand Wash is available in both a 4 oz. spray and gel. Vira Block reduces the germs that cause illness and disease and helps reduce the risk of infection and cross-contamination.
1. MMWR 2002; 51 (PP-16) 1-45
2. 2. J Hospital Infection 2001; 28 533-536
3. Lancet 2002; 359 (1489)
5. AM J Infect Control 2002 30; 355-372
6. Antiviral Res 1983: 3: 25-41
7. Infect Control Hosp Epidermiol 2000 21: 516-519
8. APPI Environ Microbiol 2000 59: 3463-3469
9. J Virol Methods 2002 103, 171-181